| |
Changing Childhood, Changed Children,
Changed Schools:
How Commercialism Impacts Children in
School
Nancy Carlsson-Paige, Ed.D. & Diane E.
Levin, Ph.D.
The commercial culture influences most
aspects of who children are in classrooms and school. To
understand the nature of these influences requires first looking
at how the commercial culture is affecting children.
Key examples of how commercial culture
is changing children:
-
Consuming can act like a drug,
diverting children from working on their own internal
interests and needs. It teaches them to associate
happiness and a sense of wellbeing with getting what they
want rather than with interacting meaningfully with
objects and people and mastering and learning how to have an
influence on their world. Consuming creates an agenda for
children provided by someone else rather than encouraging them
to work on their own internal interests and needs. This is why
the process of acquiring objects can see like a child’s
first drug. When they get the sought after object it
brings a quick fix. This high usually quickly
wears off without children working on the things they need to
work on to develop and grow from within. And over time, they
come to depend on their quick fixes rather than on their own
devices to find fleeting happiness and meaning.
-
Consuming can undermine children’s
interest in finding and working on problems of their own
making as well as the sense of personal empowerment that comes
from solving their own problems. As children focus more on
wanting rather than doing, their ability to
believe that they can make a difference is undermined.
The difficulty many children have getting engaged in solving
personally meaningful problems can be thought of as “problem
solving deficit disorder” or “PSDD”.
-
Commercial culture affects
children’s relationships with each other and with adults.
Marketers work to create a strong peer culture where children
have a lot of power in influencing what is cool and what
children want. What children have affects their popularity and
status. And PSDD can contribute to difficulties solving
problems that arise in conflicts with others. At the same
time, marketers work to undermine the status of adults; in ads
directed at children, adults are either being invisible,
stupid, or stand in the way of getting what children want.
Such representations reduce the influence adults have on
children and even contribute to premature adolescent
rebellions.
-
Commercial culture contributes to
gender stereotypes and the sexualization of childhood.
Vastly different products tend to be marketed to girls and to
boys. For instance, products for girls generally focus on
appearance, even sexiness, whereas products for boys focus on
being powerful and strong, even violent. In addition, the use
of sexualized images and behavior to market products to
children confuses them and contributes to attitudes and
behavior that undermine the kind of community schools try to
create.
Key examples of how commercial culture
is changing children in schools:
-
Commercial culture gives children the
wrong messages about the nature of the learning process.
The marketing of television, videos, and electronic toys to
babies and young children begins to shape
their learning from an early age. By the time they get to
school, kids have already learned a lot about how to learn.
Media and high tech toys entertain kids and inhibit their
problem-solving ability, undermining their natural ability to
find inherent satisfaction and take initiative in learning.
Many teachers report that children today are more passive
learners, often needing to be directed and “entertained.”
These misleading messages about learning are perpetuated when
schools join with commercial businesses to reward children
with prizes and food coupons for inherently satisfying
learning activities such as reading.
-
Commercial culture has negative
effects on the classroom curriculum. The school
curriculum is profoundly affected by commercial culture that
enters the classroom in many ways such as journal writing,
drawing, class discussions, and small group work. Children’s
interest in the values and messages of popular culture shape
many of their interactions in school, but most teachers have
not been prepared to handle sensitive topics such as violence,
sex, and advertising. Teachers struggle to focus children
back to the curriculum that has greatly narrowed in recent
years because of the emphasis on standardized tests. This
leaves children with little or no support in school for
dealing with consumer culture and the many confusing messages
it conveys.
-
Commercial culture contributes to the
diminished social skills of children in school. The
social relationships of children in school are affected by the
media and consumer culture they live in. Boys are exposed to
models of violence and aggression in media, toys and products;
they bring these models and their effects on them to school.
Our research since the deregulation of television has shown
that as boys try out the violent models they have seen, their
social relationships spiral downward. And girls’ social
relations are affected too as their interactions are dominated
by issues of appearance and consuming instead of more
substantive topics. Because of No Child Left Behind, children
now have less time for social activities in school. When they
do interact, the handicaps created by consumer culture too
often shape their interactions. And when conflicts among
children arise, they have a lessened capacity to resolve them
because of their diminished skills for problem solving.
-
Commercial culture leads to gender
stereotyping in school and greater separation between girls
and boys. Teachers describe a diminishing of overlapping
interests between girls and boys. Girls come to school often
preoccupied, as one teacher says, with “clothes, fashion,
hair, and makeup,” while boys’ heads are filled with male
images of power and aggression. Because of this, girls and
boys find less and less common ground for playing and
interacting together. Exposure to sexualized content in the
media has led to school incidents in which young boys, in
trying to sort through their confusion over what they have
seen in the media, are misunderstood and even accused of
sexual harassment.
For more information on PSDD see: “Problem Solving Deficit
Disorder: The Dangers of Remote Controlled Versus Creative
Play” by D. Levin in Where Do Children Play,
Elizabeth Goodenough (Ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne U. Press [in
press] and “From ‘I Want It!’ to ‘I Can Do It!’ Promoting
Healthy Development in the Consumer Culture” by D. Levin in
Exchange Magazine, Sept./Oct., 2004.
|
|
|
|