GET INVOLVED     |     ISSUES     |     NEWSROOM     |     RESOURCES     |     ABOUT US     |     CONTRIBUTE     |     SEARCH  
 
 
 
   

 

House Panelists Seek Opt-In Rule for Web Tracking

 

Jim Puzzanghera

Los Angeles Times

July 18, 2008

A key House lawmaker said Thursday that Internet service providers should be prohibited from tracking customers’ Web activities to deliver targeted ads without those users’ clear approval.

The controversial practice, pioneered by Silicon Valley start-up NebuAd Inc., has drawn fire from privacy advocates. They say the technology, known as deep packet inspection, raises major concerns and potentially violates federal and state wiretapping laws.

Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), chairman of the House telecommunications and Internet subcommittee, and four other subcommittee members agreed the practice violated customers’ privacy unless they specifically opt-in to such a service.

Markey grilled NebuAd Chief Executive Robert Dykes during a hearing Thursday about the company’s policies and criticized its requirement that customers opt out of the program if they do not want to be tracked.

“That’s basically saying silence is consent and as a result you can do whatever you want with their information,” Markey said. “I don’t think, unless you’ve got clear affirmative permission, that you should be able to take this incredible leap into the breaching of the privacy of Americans.”

Markey said such an opt-in requirement should be included in online privacy legislation he is working on.

NebuAd became the focus of congressional attention after it partnered with some service providers to monitor customers’ Web use. The largest was Charter Communications Inc., which last month indefinitely delayed a planned test of NebuAd’s service in some markets after complaints from privacy advocates and lawmakers, including Markey.

Dykes says his company protects privacy by developing anonymous profiles of Web users in “certain innocuous categories” such as travel. The company stays away from sensitive information such as medical issues.

“To adopt an across-the-board opt-in rule would potentially reduce the value of the advertising across the Internet, so I think major harm could be incurred that way,” Dykes said.
 

 

STAY INFORMED

 


    

Bookmark and Share

 
 
This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner

 

     

Website Designed & Maintained By: AfterFive by Design, Inc.
CCFC Logo And Fact Sheets By:
MonicaGraphicDesign.com

Copyright 2004 Commercial Free Childhood. All rights reserved