Toxic Beverly Hills
 

L. Brent Bozell III
Patriot Post

September 7, 2008

For months, the CW network has been pushing its reworking of the old teen soap “Beverly Hills 90210.” When it finally debuted, Entertainment Weekly magazine joked: “‘90210' is the Sarah Palin of TV shows – it's new, it's pretty, few people have seen it in advance...and its main purpose is to remind you of a trusty old product while adding some new vigor and soap opera to the cultural discourse.”

Put aside that nasty insult aimed at the new star on the political scene. It’s the “new vigor” phrase that’s salient. The lame, recycled “90210" opened with – an oral sex scene.

Mark your clocks: that’s five minutes into the family hour, at 8:05 pm Eastern time. That’s 7:05 pm Central, when teens have just finished supper. The strategy to lure teens with adult sexual matter continues. Those teens – it is a show for teens – were introduced to the refurbished show’s brand-new teenager characters by having a girl walk up to a car in the school parking lot on the first day of school, and find her love interest in his car with a sort of panicked, yet winded reaction. Then up came another girl’s head from his lap.

Obviously, this show is high on over-the-top shock and low on authenticity if it thinks that in broad daylight, at school bus-unloading time, teenage boys are having sex in the driver’s seat of their cars. But all that matters is the shock.

CW executives might argue that the audience approves of this show. Publicists crowed that the “90210" debut set “network records,” but this is like saying someone achieved their personal-best 100-yard-dash time of three minutes. It brought in 4.9 million viewers. But the cable network TNT easily topped that with their new legal drama “Raising the Bar,” which opened with 7.7 million viewers. It’s also unclear if the show’s ratings will remain at the debut’s level now that the curious viewer caught a sleazy sample.

As for the show’s stars, they’re already showing time-honored Hollywood hypocrisy. Jennie Garth, one of the original “Beverly Hills 90210" stars who signed up for the sequel, suggested parents should watch the show first before letting “your young kids” watch it. When asked if she would let her young ones watch, Garth exclaimed “Hell no!”

The CW executives failed to screen the show’s debut for TV critics, probably because they knew it was going to be mocked as sub-standard. More importantly, they refused to screen the show for CW affiliates, this despite promises they’ve made to regulators in Washington that program managers out in the community could have some say in their programming. How many affiliates would have flat-out refused to run this trash? They also refused to screen it for advertisers, but they caved half-way and eventually showed it to advertising agencies.

Kristin Dos Santos of E! Online was astounded at the sex plot, and confirmed the suspicion that top brass pressed to add smut. She told CNN Headline News, “I was shocked when I saw that because I had read the entire script and that was not in the original script.” She said CW hadn’t finished filming yet. “So clearly, someone, a higher up at the CW, whoever it may have been, decided at the last minute that they needed to inject some sex into the show to make it more like ‘Gossip Girl,’ to create a bigger buzz.”

CW knows no bounds in creating “bigger buzz,” and will stop at nothing to get children to watch its smut. They marketed this ‘90210' debut with the shocking sex plot by using BusRadio – a service that broadcasts audio exclusively into school buses populated with children as young as six. The BusRadio website aggressively boosted the debut, complete with video clips touting the show: “Get ready for the two-hour event everyone will be talking about.”

One critic of the relatively new bus service struck the obvious note: “BusRadio sells itself to school districts as an age-appropriate alternative to FM radio, but once again they’ve demonstrated that they don’t know or don’t care what age-appropriate means.”

The show is also being promoted on such child-centric merchandise as backpacks, school supplies, cosmetics, T-shirts and sweatshirts. The CW network continues to enjoy marketing sexualized programming to children. It’s surprising there’s no word yet on whether CW will introduce its own line of promotional condoms or other sexual products.

The flailing, failing CW network is in dire straits. Their overall ratings stink. Their CW-affiliated stations are beginning to drop the “CW” out of their station logos – and that now includes even Chicago powerhouse WGN, their signature affiliate. This sleaze-selling strategy will result only in the latest in a line of CW flops and fiascoes.

In the meantime, now, thanks to CW, parents have to worry about poison on school buses.

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner