Study: Alcohol Marketing to Youths Shifts from Print to Cable TV
Eric Newman
Brandweek
December 19, 2007
Cable TV alcohol advertising aimed at
young people has jumped dramatically, a new study has
found.
The research from the Council on Alcohol Marketing and
Youth found that while there’s been a 50% drop in
magazine exposure for such advertisements, cable TV ads
are a booming category for booze purveyors. The data is
contained in CAMY’s new study out today, Youth
Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Television and in
National Magazines, 2001 to 2006.
The study found that while overall youth exposure to
alcohol marketing has declined roughly 6% from 2001 to
2006, TV exposure is growing.
“There’s been an explosion in the TV medium,” said
CAMY’s executive director David Jernigan, adding that
television had seen a strong increase in youth exposure
to alcohol marketing during the study period, and that
the main drivers have been the distilled spirits brands.
“Alcohol marketers are all over the cable channels. The
last thing kids need is more exposure to alcohol ads,
and putting those ads on [TV] stations does exactly
that.”
According to Jernigan, the top three offenders on the
channel roster are Comedy Central, VH1 and BET. While
the latter two have made efforts to reduce the volume of
their alcohol marketing, Comedy Central’s has only grown
since 2001. CAMY data shows that both VH1 and BET peaked
in 2004, with $11 million and $3.6 million in
advertising revenues from alcohol marketers,
respectively, while those numbers had since fallen to
$1.5 million and $2,800 by the end of 2006. Conversely,
Comedy Central has been on a steady increase since 2003,
reaching $21.3 million in ad revenues from alcohol
marketers in 2006.
A shrinking market, magazine ad revenues from distilled
spirits reached its peak in 2002 at $261 million
industrywide, a lofty sum that dwindled to $205 million
by 2006. Moving away from print marketing, Jernigan said
he felt distilled spirits marketers were increasingly
looking to TV as a means of “leveling the playing field
with beer” marketing.
Still, Jernigan added that with the variety of programs
for those marketers to choose to place their ads,
selecting shows that rate higher for viewers under the
legal drinking age was a marketing misstep. A simulation
conducted by the watchdog agency in 2004 showed that if
alcohol marketers shifted their creative to programs
below 15% youth-audience composition, the advertisers
would save 8% of their ad spend with “virtually no
impact on their ability to reach 21- to 34-year-olds,”
Jernigan said.
A complete PDF version of the report can be found
Here.
