Why Hollywood Studios
Can't Kick the
Junk-Food Habit
Disney-McDonald's Deal
Ends, but Movies Still
Rely on Fast-Feeder
Marketing Pacts
By T.L.
Stanley and Stephanie
Thompson
AdAge.com, May 18,
2006
LOS ANGELES (AdAge.com)
-- Business-page
obituaries of the deal
between Walt Disney
Co. and McDonald's
have maintained that
the studio found the
children's obesity
debate surrounding the
fast-feeder too hot to
handle. But the truth
is fast-food marketers
are still on the
Hollywood A-list.
The debate over
children's obesity
does not appear to
have had much
impact among
Hollywood studio
deal-makers.
Big bucks
Promotional pacts reap
hundreds of millions
of dollars for studios
annually -- a marketer
like Pepsi can pony up
$30 million for a
single tentpole movie
-- so any thoughts
that studios are about
to altruistically kick
the sugar and fat
habit are little more
than wishful thinking
from the nation's food
nannies.
"We have not shied
away from discussions
to any clients because
they make food that
may not be the world's
healthiest," said one
agency executive who
forges entertainment
deals with marketers.
"No one selling to
moms is saying 'Don't
talk to Drake's cakes
or McDonald's."'
Disney-McDonald's
While Disney's 10-year
exclusive pact with
McDonald's -- valued
at $2 to $3 billion in
promotional value and
royalties -- lapses at
year's end, executives
at both companies said
they will continue to
work together on
kid-targeted
promotions on a
project-by-project
basis. As recently as
a week ago, Disney
executives were in
discussions with
McDonald's about
future film releases,
said executives close
to the situation.
That's hardly a
denouncement of the
fast-feeder. In
addition, Disney
continues its
relationship with
McDonald's for its
theme parks.
At the same time,
recent deals show food
companies aren't
changing menus to
health and wellness
foods when it comes to
film tie-ins. Kellogg
Co.'s program with
"Ice Age 2: The
Meltdown," for
example, featured
Honey Smacks and
Keebler Chips Deluxe,
despite the company
being sued earlier
this year by the
Center for Science in
the Public Interest
for marketing junk
food to young
children.
Other up-and-coming
matchups include
Wendy's PepsiCo and
Crunch 'n Munch with
Dreamworks' "Over the
Hedge"; M&Ms,
Coca-Cola and
McDonald's with
"Pirates of the
Caribbean: Dead Man's
Chest"; and Burger
King and KFC with
Warner Bros.' "Happy
Feet."
Advertising
guidelines
In a few cases,
nutritional and
advertising guidelines
have affected
marketing approaches.
But those standards
have been set by food
marketers, not
studios. General Mills
recently announced it
would no longer
advertise to children
under age 6 (a tack
taken already by
PepsiCo, Kraft and
Unilever), and has
severed ties to
Nickelodeon's Nick Jr.
altogether.
So there may be more
of a balance. Giorgia
Butler,
director-promotions
for youth ad agency
and marketing
consultancy Geppetto
Group, said that "in
every area of
entertainment from
music to gaming to
film to TV, there is a
health element
involved," whether it
be Cookie Monster
eating vegetables or
scenes in the Disney
Channel's "High School
Musical" where kids
are entreated to
dance.
But a retreat? Hardly.
"Studios won't walk
away from those
categories," said
Mitch Litvak,
president of The L.A.
Office,which provides
marketing information
to both brands and
entertainment
companies. "They'll
shift from being
kid-targeted to mom-
and adult-targeted."
|