GET INVOLVED     |     ISSUES     |     NEWSROOM     |     RESOURCES     |     ABOUT US     |     CONTRIBUTE     |     SEARCH  
 
 
 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pop culture pulls in major bucks

 

David Lieberman

USA Today
April 17, 2008

Entertainment and sports heroes had only a so-so year in 2007 if you look at traditional yardsticks such as sales of tickets and discs.

But their appeal as pop culture icons was stronger than ever, judging by sales of clothing, book bags, games, toys, food packaging and other goods emblazoned with licensed names and likenesses.

Popular characters and brands including Hannah Montana, Calvin Klein and the New York Yankees helped drive global spending on licensed merchandise up 3.6% last year to $187 billion, according to trade magazine License Global and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

"The emerging markets and middle classes in Eastern Europe, China and India want our brands in entertainment, lifestyle, fashion and sports," says Steven Ekstract, the magazine's publisher. That's one reason he expects sales this year to hit $200 billion, even if the U.S. economy remains in a slump. Another reason: When money is tight, people take comfort in familiar and trusted names.

He and others also are optimistic that kids attending this summer's popcorn movies including Iron Man, Speed Racer, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, Kung Fu Panda, The Incredible Hulk and Wall-E will walk out wanting related toys and clothes.

About 44% of cash spent on licensed merchandise in 2006 went for goods linked to entertainment characters, most from movies and television, says the International Licensing Industry Merchandisers' Association (LIMA).

Manufacturers and retailers take a leap of faith when they make and stock products based on entertainment characters. These commitments often must be made a year in advance.

Sometimes, promising films misfire.

For example, sales last year tied to The Golden Compass and Bee Movie "turned out to be somewhat disappointing," says Michael Stone, CEO of licensing consulting firm The Beanstalk Group. Movie-related sales "were primarily driven by evergreen and franchise properties. There wasn't a big new merchandising success."

Still, Disney reinforced its No. 1 position on the License Global company list with a string of successes including Hannah Montana (the TV show with singer Miley Cyrus as the title character), its made-for-TV High School Musical franchise and characters promoted in its Disney Princesses merchandise lines.

"Most entertainment is here today and gone tomorrow," Ekstract says. "Disney creates brands. And they tapped into the zeitgeist of the tween girl marketplace."

If a movie's big enough, it can sell merchandise even when it isn't in theaters. This year, Star Wars fans who own a Nintendo Wii can imagine themselves to be Jedi knights with a game controller shaped like the movie's famous light sabers.

Adults also often take comfort in products with familiar names which is why several non-entertainment corporations are entering the fray.

"They're taking their brand names that consumers already know and trust, and licensing them into related but not competing product categories," says LIMA President Charles Riotto. "That creates a very nice revenue stream."

For example, Stone says he's helping Purina put its name on pet products, including leashes, collars and toys. Samsonite's brand will go on travel-related items such as diaper bags and electronic equipment. Vespa's looking to become a symbol for Italian design in apparel, footwear and espresso machines. Food companies also want to grow into pop icons. Popsicle has a line of candies, Burger King is putting its name on chips, and Hawaiian Punch is on fruit snacks. Aquafina is licensing a cosmetics line. Starburst candy will be on T-shirts.

The public's craving for good taste goes beyond food: In June, many artists will flock to the Licensing International Expo in New York looking for deals to put their names on lines of merchandise, including wall coverings, bedding and furniture.

"The show has been more responsible for this boom in licensed art than anything," Riotto says. "Ten or 12 years ago, we had maybe a dozen artists exhibiting. Now, there's well over 100 maybe closer to 200."
 


 

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner

 

 

STAY INFORMED

 

Email Address: State:
 

Subscribers receive no more than

1-2 emails per week

 

SUPPORT CCFC

CCFC does not accept corporate funding.

We rely on member donations for support.

Click Here to Contribute

Copyright 2004 Commercial Free Childhood. All rights reserved